The Veterinary Internship and Residency Matching Program (VIRMP) was originally designed to ensure a fair and transparent placement process for veterinary graduates seeking internships and residencies. The program worked well for a while. The goal was to create a level playing field where candidates and programs could find the best mutual fit through a standardized, impartial match process.
However, in recent years, the credibility and perceived fairness of the VIRMP have come under increasing scrutiny. While the program technically continues to operate, many argue that it has lost much of its intended validity due to the ways certain institutions and corporate entities now approach the recruiting process.
Key Factors Undermining the Match’s Credibility
Programs Circumventing the Formal Process: Rather than relying on the official match results, some programs privately approach top candidates before the match date. These behind-the-scenes negotiations often include making informal handshake offers or providing attractive incentives - such as higher stipends, specialized training opportunities, or improved benefits packages - contingent upon the candidate withdrawing from the official match.
This off-the-record courting erodes the basic principle of fairness
and neutrality that the match is supposed to uphold.
Forcing Candidates to Withdraw: In some cases, programs that engage in these secret negotiations explicitly require that the candidate remove themselves from the official match in exchange for a guaranteed position. This leaves the candidate in a difficult position: they either risk not securing a position through the highly competitive match process or accept a sure thing offer outside the system.
By doing so, these programs effectively siphon off top talent,
leaving the official match process less meaningful
and reducing opportunities for other candidates to compete on equal footing.
Corporate Influence and Consolidation: The rise of large corporate veterinary chains has also played a significant role. As more veterinary hospitals and specialty practices consolidate under corporate ownership, these entities have greater resources and market leverage. They may strategically bypass the match, using their financial and operational muscle to recruit premier candidates ahead of time.
While the match tries to ensure that all programs - academic, nonprofit, and
private - use the same playbook, corporate interests can skew this balance
by offering special perks or faster career advancement paths
outside the formal system.
Undermining Transparency and Accountability
The strength of the VIRMP was in its standardized, regulated approach.
When programs disregarded these rules, the entire system
lost transparency and collapsed.
Without a clear, standardized structure, it’s difficult for candidates to know if they are truly competing on merit or whether the best positions have already been cherry-picked through covert deals.
Moreover, attempts at oversight or enforcement by the match administrators have proven challenging. Programs are often adept at concealing such negotiations, and candidates - fearful of losing their spot - are rarely willing to report infractions.
Eroded Trust Among Candidates and Institutions
Over time, as more candidates hear anecdotal reports of colleagues
being approached directly or note how certain top-tier positions
mysteriously disappear from the official listings, trust erodes.
(Continued in Part 2)
Comments